| PRINCIPAL POLICIES
OF THE TOKYO METROPOLITAN GOVERNMENT |
 |
| Opposition to Transfer of the Capital |
|
|
The national government is working on plans to move the capital, including
the National Diet, outside the Tokyo area. These plans are aimed at
avoiding the current concentration of administrative and other functions
in Tokyo, at strengthening the capacity to respond to disasters, and
at reforming the national administrative structure as a whole.
The transfer of the National Diet and other capital city functions
being considered by the national government will involve the key legal,
administrative and judicial institutions of the state. In effect this
will mean the transfer of the capital itself. Such a transfer is an
enormous problem that may well constitute a serious danger not just
for Tokyo but for the nation itself, and the TMG is firmly opposed to
any such idea.
Reasons for Opposition
TMG is opposed to transferring the capital for the following reasons:
 |
Socioeconomic conditions are changing
greatly, with land prices continuing to fall substantially ever
since the bursting of the economic bubble in the early 1990s and
with the Japanese economy still unable to extract itself from interminable
recession. Such changes mean that there is no longer any point in
transferring the capital. |
 |
Japan's international status is
declining rapidly as international competition intensifies. Under
such conditions, the main priority should not be to transfer the
capital elsewhere, thereby depriving the metropolitan area of much
of its strength, but to revitalize and stimulate the area. |
 |
The finances of the national government
and local governments are in dire straits, with massive long-term
debts of 700 trillion yen. Building anew capital would constitute
an enormous waste of money and would further sap the strength of
the nation. |
 |
The key political and economic institutions
are currently located within a radius of 1.5 kilometers around the
Kasumigaseki, Marunouchi and Otemachi districts of Tokyo, thus permitting
efficient political and economic management. The political and economic
spheres are inseparable, and a city in which the political sphere
alone is set apart is unlikely to function adequately. |
 |
Global environmental problems are growing
increasingly serious, and a new large-scale development project
extending over 8,500 hectares and involving extensive destruction
of forest and countryside runs counter to the trend of the times. |
History of the plan
| 1990 (Nov): |
Resolution on Transfer of the National Diet passed by both houses
of the National Diet. |
| 1992 (Dec): |
Enactment of Law on Transfer of the National Diet. |
| 1999 (Dec): |
The Council on Transfer of the National Diet proposes three possible
sites for the transfer. |
| 2000 (May): |
The House of Representatives Special Committee on Transfer of
the National Diet adopts a resolution advocating selection of one
of the three potential sites within two years. |
| 2002 (May): |
The House of Representatives Special Committee on Transfer of
the National Diet shelves plans to narrow down the list of potential
relocation sites. |
| 2003 (May): |
The House of Representatives Special Committee on Transfer of
the National Diet adopts its Interim Report Concerning Transfer
of the National Diet, and submits its findings to the Speaker of
the House. |
| 2003 (June): |
The House of Councillors Special Committee on Transfer of the
National Diet adopts its Study Report Concerning Transfer of the
National Diet (interim report), and submits its findings to the
President of the House. |
| 2003 (June): |
Joint Inter-Party Deliberation Council of Both Houses on Transfer
of the National Diet established. |
Main response to date:
 |
Production of video opposing transfer
of the capital entitled "A Clear No! to Transfer of the Capital"
(April 2002). |
 |
Governor Ishihara gives his opinion
as a witness before the House of Representatives Special Committee
on Transfer of the National Diet (May 2002). |
 |
The Tokyo Metropolitan Assembly and
the Tokyo Metropolitan Government hold a rally to express their
resolute opposition to transfer of the capital (May 2002). |
 |
Publishing of pamphlet "Ending
Plans to Transfer the Capital: Negative Legacy of the Bubble Era"
(March 2003). |
 |
Eight prefectures and cities (Saitama
Prefecture, Chiba Prefecture, Tokyo Metropolis, Kanagawa Prefecture,
Yokohama City, Kawasaki City, Chiba City and Saitama City) lodge
a strongly-worded joint appeal in opposition to plans to relocate
the capital (November 2003) |
Future Action Plans
The forum of debate for the issue of relocation of the capital has
shifted from the Special Committees on Transfer of the National Diet
in both houses of the Diet to the Joint Inter-Party Deliberation Council
of Both Houses on Transfer of the National Diet. However, in view of
the fact that numerous issues, including the pros and cons of such a
massive relocation itself, have yet to be resolved, TMG will continue
to carefully monitor and collect information on related movements in
the National Diet and other developments. This will incorporate the
results of research studies underscoring the suitability of Tokyo as
the traditional and continued site for the nation's capital, in
working toward the ultimate goal of the total retraction of the relocation
plan.
| Previous Page | CONTENTS
| Next Page |
|